You have three browser tabs open, one for each marketing platform on your shortlist. Each has a comparison page. Each comparison page has a table. And in each table, remarkably, the company that wrote the page has the most green ticks. By the third tab you have learned nothing except that all three companies employ someone who can build a table.

That is not dishonesty, mostly. A vendor writes a comparison page to explain why it believes its product is the better choice, and it picks the rows where it believes that most strongly. NetWebMedia has a comparison page too, and it is written the same way, by us, with us choosing the rows. I am going to use it as the example in this post, because it is the one I can criticise without being unfair to anyone else.

Keep reading comparison pages. They are often the fastest way to learn what a vendor thinks its strengths are. Just read them the way you would read a CV: as a claim the author wants you to believe, which you then check.

Check 1: who is in the other columns

Look at the column headers before the rows. A page that names specific competitors has made claims you can verify against those competitors' own websites. A page that compares against categories, such as traditional agencies or enterprise CRMs, has made claims that are easier to write and much harder to check, because no single company has to recognize itself in the column.

Our page compares against categories, such as traditional agencies and DIY platforms, rather than named products. That is a reasonable way to explain positioning, and it is also exactly the kind of table you should treat as opinion. If you are comparing us with a specific product, open that product's own pricing and feature pages and build your own table. Ten minutes of that is worth more than any table either vendor wrote.

Check 2: find the row where they lose

A comparison page with no losing rows is a brochure. A useful one tells you where the author is weaker, because that is the information you cannot easily get elsewhere and the vendor has the least reason to volunteer.

Our page has a section called where we still catch up. It concedes a much smaller integration marketplace than the big platforms and less brand recognition in the United States. Both are real, and both matter to some buyers. If your business depends on a long tail of plug-in integrations, a platform with a bigger marketplace may simply be the better fit. When you read any vendor's page, look for that section. If it does not exist, ask the salesperson directly where the product is weaker, and notice how long the pause is.

Check 3: separate what is live from what is planned

Comparison tables mix features that work today with features on a roadmap, and the labels that tell them apart are often small. Our page marks several items as beta or as roadmap items, and that labelling is the honest part of the page. It is also the part that goes stale fastest, because roadmaps move and pages do not update themselves.

So treat any roadmap row as not available, for us or anyone else. On the day you buy, ask the vendor to confirm in writing which of the features you care about are live in your plan, today. A feature you are waiting for is a feature you do not have, and a purchase decision should rest only on what you can use in the first month.

Check 4: rebuild the price for your own situation

Price rows in comparison tables are usually calculated for a scenario the author chose: a certain number of seats and a certain plan. Change the scenario and the ranking can flip. Write down your own numbers first: how many people will log in, how many contacts you have today and expect in a year, which channels you need, and whether you want someone else to do the setup.

Then read the conditions, not the headline. Setup fees, minimum terms, per-seat charges and contact limits live in the small print of every vendor's pricing page. Our comparison page lists flat pricing with no per-seat fees and month-to-month terms as advantages, and the pricing page is where the setup fees and minimum commitments for each plan are written out. Read that page before you believe the table, ours or anyone's.

Check 5: test the claim that matters most to you

Every buyer has one or two rows that actually decide the purchase. For some it is bilingual support, for others a particular integration or a done-for-you setup. Find your deciding rows and test those, specifically, during the trial. If the page says bilingual, switch the interface and the customer-facing pages into the second language and see what breaks. If it says done for you, ask exactly what gets built and by when, and get the answer in writing.

Our page leans on a few claims I would expect a careful buyer to test: bilingual English and Spanish throughout, AI agents built on Claude, month-to-month terms, and a team that builds the setup for you instead of handing over a login. Test them. If any of them does not hold up for your business, that is the answer, and it is better found in the trial than in month four.

One more habit: ask about the pictures

Sales pages love screenshots: a pipeline full of deals, a campaign report with healthy numbers, a dashboard trending upward, a calendar with no gaps. Often that is demo data, and a screenshot is a fair way to show what a screen looks like. It is weak evidence of what the product will do for you. If a figure on a sales page matters to your decision, ask where it came from and whether it is a measurement or an illustration.

A vendor who can answer that in a sentence or two is usually one you can work with. A vendor who answers with another screenshot has told you something too.

A comparison table you can trust

The only comparison table I fully trust is the one the buyer builds. Put your deciding rows down the side, the two or three products across the top, and fill each cell from the vendor's own pricing and feature pages, with a link next to every cell. Where a vendor's page does not answer a row, write unknown, and ask them. The unknowns are often the most revealing cells on the sheet.

If NetWebMedia is one of the columns, start from our comparison page for what we claim, then check it against the product pages and the pricing page. If you find a row on our page that no longer matches what the product does, tell us and we will fix the page.

See who Google and AI recommend instead of you

Enter your website and get a free check of what Google and AI actually read about your business — and who they point people to instead. No call, no account: the report renders right on the page.

Run my free check →

Rather have it done for you? In the AEO Fix Sprint we implement your report's fixes on your site in 5 business days →

Share this article

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook WhatsApp

Comments

Leave a comment

← Back to all articles